Wide-ranging chat about charitable giving, with the Daily Mail.
What to give to, what to avoid, one of Caroline’s favourite charities, how to choose a charity… (~20 minutes) Please click on the picture below to watch the full video.
Giving Evidence and think-tank Charity Futures break new ground in researching what matters to charities and donors
Charity Futures, the new sector think tank led by Sir Stephen Bubb, is launching a major consultation to find out the topics on which donors and charity leaders most want more research to help them in their vital work. Clearly this is essential for ensuring that charitable activity and giving can be based on sound evidence.
Giving Evidence will run the consultation, which invite input from any charity, foundation, 
public or private donor in the United Kingdom. Through an open ‘crowd-sourcing’ process, including a series of focus groups across the country (which finished in June 2018) and a couple of rounds of public, open, online survey, the project will invite charities, private donors and institutional funders to say where more research would be of most use. The project is supported by a distinguished advisory group of funders, private donors, researchers, charity leaders and umbrella bodies (listed below). Continue reading
How can you tell if a charity is effective, when there is little independent analysis?
This article first published in the Financial Times
Judging by my inbox, there seems to be huge demand for advice about which charities to support. As donors have followed the turmoil around Oxfam, Save the Children, Kids Company and others before them, they want decent independent analysis along the lines of the data that rating agencies provide for bonds or Which? does for fridges.
There isn’t any.
It doesn’t exist, because of costs, incentives and the genuine challenges involved in nailing it down. Continue reading
Making a big gift to draw other donors is only useful if the charity is highly effective
This article first published in the Financial Times
The practice of donors offering to “match” gifts made to charities they support has become common in the charity world. In the run-up to Christmas, many have been offering to double donations. In the recent Challenge Campaign, for instance, money given to selected charities was doubled by the Big Give, set up by Sir Alec Reed, founder of Reed, the recruitment firm.
Others schemes propose different deals: one donor was offering to give $2 for every $1 given on Friday to Charity Navigator, a charity rating agency; while PayPal will add 1 per cent to all donations made through its platform until New Year.
The UK’s Department for International Development does it too. Its UK Aid Match offered up to £5m from the UK aid budget to eight charities.
The theory is that the match attracts new donations. If your aim is helping your chosen charity to raise money, is it a good idea to offer to match other people’s contributions? The rigorous evidence suggests that it is. Continue reading
This article first published in Alliance Magazine.
The first president of eBay, Jeff Skoll, set up his Global Threats Fund in 2010 to ‘make 
progress against five of the gravest threats to humanity’: climate change, pandemics, water security, nuclear proliferation, and conflict in the Middle East. It closes this month having spent its $100 million, and this week published a report about “what worked, what didn’t work, and what we learned about philanthropy’s role in reducing global threats”. As more foundations ‘spend out’ and publish their learning, we will probably see more such documents. This one is a weird read. Continue reading
If you, like millions of people, want to give this Christmas / holiday season, the following are all good bets, in our view:
Medicins Sans Frontieres: They always seem to be to be where the sh*t is worst, e.g., 
Yemen, Rakhine province in Myanmar (where the Rohinga live/lived). We’ve never formally analysed them but all our contact with them and literature we’ve seen from them implies that they have their act together. Continue reading
This article first published in the Financial Times.
We kept overheads low, boasts Camila Batmanghelidjh in her book published last week 
about how and why Kids Company, the charity she founded, collapsed in 2015.
Perhaps skimping on administrative costs was a false economy. In the book she also says the charity kept paper records for the 36,000 children and young adults it claimed to support, which were “stored in 80 cabinets”. It hardly sounds ideal. Continue reading
This article first published in the Financial Times.
Malala Yousafzai starts at Oxford university next week. The Nobel Peace Prize, which she
shared at the age of 17, was for her work promoting the right of all children to education. Many people give money in pursuit of that aim, so it’s reasonable to ask what we know about improving education, particularly in less developed countries.
The answer is surprisingly little. Rigorous evidence about both primary and secondary education is rather sparse, though primary education is better studied. Very few programmes have been tested often enough, and in enough places, to give confidence about their effectiveness. Continue reading
Videos of other talks: www.giving-evidence.com/video
