Category Archives: Impact & evaluation

Evidence-based philanthropy made easy

Posted on January 7, 2019 by

This talk explains what evidence-based giving is, why it matters, and how it needn’t be soooo complicated. Even the first 30 seconds here show why minimising administrative costs to keep an aid programme ‘cheap’ is a bad idea. This talk … Continue reading →

Posted in Donor behaviour & giving stats, Effective giving, Impact & evaluation | Leave a comment

Breaking the hunger cycle for the price of a bus ticket

Posted on March 7, 2017 by

Modern philanthropists adopt an evidence-based approach This article first published in the Financial Times. The Christian tradition of giving things up for Lent comes, it is said, from making a virtueof necessity. Last year’s harvest, gathered in the autumn, would … Continue reading →

Posted in Effective giving, Great charities, Impact & evaluation | 1 Comment

How impact measurement can be more useful

Posted on November 15, 2016 by

This article first published in Civil Society Magazine.  Most of the impact data charities gather does not help raise funds or improve performance This opinion piece is a response to an article titled How do you measure the value of … Continue reading →

Posted in Effective giving, Impact & evaluation | Leave a comment

When charitable donations cost more than they give

Posted on November 8, 2016 by

Popularity contests for funding waste time and resources This article first published in the Financial Times. Some charitable donors are a net drain: they cost organisations they seek to help more than they contribute. Others come pretty close, costing nearly … Continue reading →

Posted in Effective giving, Impact & evaluation | Leave a comment

Creating a sector-wide research agenda: Industrial Farm Animal Production

Posted on November 2, 2016 by

‘Ask an important question an answer it reliably’ is a central tenet of medical research. Yet  much ‘impact research’ in the charity and social sectors (including monitoring and evaluation’) isn’t like that. Instead, we ask lots of questions, and answer … Continue reading →

Posted in Impact & evaluation | Leave a comment

What is evidence-based giving and why does it matter?

Posted on October 9, 2016 by

Interview with Caroline Fiennes, Director of Giving Evidence (16 mins):   This interview was made possible by the Skoll Foundation. It was recorded in Oxford in April 2015, in a single take and with no notice of the questions. More … Continue reading →

Posted in Impact & evaluation, Promoting giving | Leave a comment

What would have happened otherwise?

Posted on August 26, 2016 by

First published in the FT. Did the charity make it happen, or would it have happened anyway? The purpose of a charity’s work — and your support for it — is to create a benefit beyond what would have happened … Continue reading →

Posted in Impact & evaluation | Leave a comment

How to give it: Why charity should begin in the science lab

Posted on April 3, 2016 by

This article first published in the Financial Times. Not all charities are good causes. This may sound surprising, because we’re used to thinking of them all as being somehow virtuous, but they vary in their effectiveness. Smart donors know that … Continue reading →

Posted in Donor behaviour & giving stats, Effective giving, Impact & evaluation | 3 Comments

Oops: we made the non-profit impact revolution go wrong

Posted on March 7, 2016 by

By Caroline Fiennes and Ken Berger, managing director of Algorhythm.  The non-profit ‘impact revolution’ – over a decade’s work to increase the impact of non-profits – has gone in the wrong direction. As veterans and cheerleaders of the revolution, we are both … Continue reading →

Posted in Donor behaviour & giving stats, Effective giving, Impact & evaluation | Leave a comment

What makes a helpful reporting & evaluation system? Learning from an outlier

Posted on January 27, 2016 by

Funders’ reporting and evaluation systems are rarely loved: they are more often regarded as compliance or ‘policing’. But not so for the Inter-American Foundation apparently: IAF received better feedback from its grantees on its reporting and evaluation system than have … Continue reading →

Posted in Analysing giving, Effective giving, Impact & evaluation, meta-research | Leave a comment